The Palm Beach Post
By The Miami Herald   |  Action, Movies  |  June 23, 2009
Optimus Prime leads his team of Autobots in 'Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen' (Paramount Pictures)Photos See photos from the L.A. premiere

Optimus Prime leads his team of Autobots in 'Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen' (Paramount Pictures)

Just how enormous is the scale of Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen? Big enough that the movie has a prologue set in the year 17,000 B.C. Big enough that the film’s opening setpiece, in which the good robots (i.e. the Autobots) suss out a bad robot (i.e. a Decepticon) in their midst in modern-day Shanghai, is spectacular enough to make practically any other summer spectacular wish it could have it as a climactic finish.

Just how slight is the plot of Fallen, which was written by Ehren Kruger, Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman? Slight enough to take up maybe 45 minutes of screen time, if Ingmar Bergman had directed it. Slight enough that there are long chunks in the film during which you could leave the theater, take a leisurely stroll to stretch your legs, catch up on your e-mail, and rejoin the movie in progress without having missed a thing.

Perhaps the biggest problem with Fallen, which is probably the most anticipated movie of the summer and will undoubtedly be the biggest at the box office, is the same one that afflicts most sequels: The freshness and sense of discovery of the first film, which depicted mankind’s discovery of giant robots living among us disguised as cars, is gone.


Instead, the Autobots are now an established (albeit secret) branch of the U.S. military, fighting to make sure the bad machines vanquished in the 2007 original stay vanquished.

Meanwhile, the teenaged Sam (Shia LaBeouf), who is preparing to go away to college at Princeton, and his girlfriend Mikaela (Megan Fox), who suddenly seems at least five years too old for her role and has managed to get worse as an actress since the last film, are planning to keep their relationship going long distance.

The two are not kept apart long, though, since soon after Sam arrives on campus, he and Mikaela must reunite to help their mechanical giant pal Optimus Prime (voiced by Peter Cullen) fend off his deadliest foe yet. Director Michael Bay, reluctant to mess with what worked the first time around, increases the unexpected humor and slapstick of the original film, devoting lots of screen time — arguably too much — to the antics of Sam’s manic college roommate (Ramon Rodriguez), Sam’s goofy parents (Kevin Dunne and Julie White), and a pair of smart-mouthed Autobots named Mudflap and Skids.

But all the humorous hijinks in the world cannot counteract the terminal case of bloat that afflicts Fallen, which runs at least 40 minutes too long, a common problem among Bay’s films. You could, for example, excise all the scenes featuring Josh Duhamel and Tyrese Gibson as elite Army soldiers and not lose a thing. The length also helps to obfuscate the story, which, despite essentially being an exercise in villain-of-the-week formulas, often borders on the incomprehensible.

What saves Fallen, aside from La Beouf’s undeniable charisma (he’s a natural-born star, that kid), is that Bay continues to tamp down his worst instincts as an action filmmaker.

The movie may be nonsense, but it’s dazzling, visually striking nonsense, whether during a free-for-all battle between a badly outnumbered Optimus Prime and a squad of baddies in the forest or the sequences in which a giant mass of shiny ball bearings coalesces into a robot and a gigantic Decepticon comprised of construction cranes climbs one of Egypt’s Great Pyramids, the ancient stone crumbling beneath its weight.

How and why a robot is running around Egypt is one of the problems with Fallen, which often seems to take good ideas — like the concept of a vintage fighter jet at the Smithsonian as a slumbering Decepticon — and then intentionally do the least interesting things imaginable with them, such as sending it in search of a key unwisely named the matrix.

At least the special effects are remarkable: You never tire of the endless variations of robots Bay and his computer-generated-effects crew come up with, and there are only a couple of shots in the film in which those effects don’t meld seamlessly with the flesh-and-blood actors. In its climactic half hour, the picture degenerates into an endless procession of explosions, as every movie Bay directs is contractually bound to do, but at least the thing looks astounding. More substance would have been nice, but in the thick of the summer movie season, sometimes looks are all you need.

– Rene Rodriguez

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

4 Responses to “Bloated ‘Transformers’ gets by on its looks”

  1. whirlwind says:

    Pretty much the exact thought I got when I saw the film. Just too much of a good (and bad) thing. The writing was horrible, a lot of the comic relief was just flat and boring, and the romance aspect was distracting and pointless.

    The action scenes were great when they were there, though. The movie would have been so much better had it been more action centric.

    Also, the SR-71 isn’t a ‘fighter’ jet but since it turns into a robot who fights, i’ll let that one slide.

  2. Starscream says:

    Rene, you were way to kind, Ebert gives it the pounding it deserves: http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090623/REVIEWS/906239997

  3. Sandy says:

    I haven’t seen the film yet, plan to soon, but spoke with a friend’s young son who was still thrilled the morning after he got to see an early premier. His mother was equally delighted with it. As for Eberts review, well I generally find his “great films to see” ones to avoid and especially found it amusing where he mentioned gunfire never harming alien lifeforms. He obviously forgot in the previous Transformers that the sabot rounds did harm the Deceptacons… And while it didn’t kill Frenzy, who can forget the sight of that saw cutting off his head. I’m looking forward to a very good time when I see soon. Of course, I’m neither expecting nor desirous of needing a thesaurus to understand the film… Just something to transport me to another place for a time.

  4. Debbie says:

    Sadly, the writers got the idea that they should remove the comedy and replace it with foul language,sexual theme’s and gangsta’ wannabe robots. The stereotyping of young black men and objectifying of young college women was so unappealing to me. The movie was also too long. If you enjoy lots of loud machine fights you might like it. Shia LaBeouf was likeable as always but Megan Fox was like an advertisement for lip gloss and by the end after falling in sand, having things blow up around her and falling off a buildings she looked like she just came from the salon.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply


We'd like your thoughts on this story. I appreciate your willingness to share them. At pbpulse.com, we want to avoid comments that are obscene, hateful, racist or otherwise inappropriate. If you post offensive comments, we will delete them as soon as we can. If you see such comments, please report them to us (video tutorial) by clicking on the date/time stamp of the comment and emailing that URL to this link.

Tim Burke, Publisher, The Palm Beach Post.


Find a movie


Enter movie name


Copyright 2012 The Palm Beach Post. All rights reserved. By using PalmBeachPost.com, you accept the terms of our visitor agreement. Please read it.
Contact PalmBeachPost.com | Privacy Policy
This website is ACAP-enabled