
I’ve written about “Survivor” and its weird hold on me before like an unhealthy romantic relationship, and as I read about the new twists and casting news for its upcoming season, premiering Sept. 14, I am considering a break-up. Again. Now, it might be one of those yo-yo breakups where I show back up again. But right now, I’m pondering packing up “Survivor”‘s stuff and asking it to call Tyrone to tell him come on, just like Erykah Badu did.
Here’s my basic issue: The show keeps relying on stunt casting, like returning players (we’ll find out who they are later) and someone who bears the same last name as one of “Survivor”‘s second-favorite repeat offender/fame hooker. And while I know it’s all about ratings, those twists are not only unfair to the other contestants, but cheapen things for the true fans, too. Read on. Am I wrong?
- Returning players have an unfair advantage: A lot of game shows have celebrity editions, where those famous folks give their winnings to charity. That seems fair to me, because we assume that those people don’t need the money. And even if they did, they wouldn’t be trying to make it this way. Reality TV changed all that, mostly because reality stars are on these shows to make money, or book “Playboy” or their next reality show. Thus, we have “Bachelor Pad,” which besides the tackiness, I have no real problems with, because they’re all in the same fame whoring boat.
Not so much on “Survivor,” where the new returning players, much like Russell Hantz, Rob Mariano and others before them, are playing with newbies for the same money. It’s ghastly – under any normal circumstance, anyone who has played a mentally and physically challenging game like that would have some sort of advantage. But last year’s vets are so identified with the game, particularly eventual winner Mariano, that the other players got all awestruck and relied on them as leaders (Note to future Survivors: Your job is not to help someone else win a million dollars. If all you do is help them, you can’t help you. For real.) They’re professional Survivors, basically. They could list that under “profession.”
We have no idea who the returning players are, but the rumor is that it’s Ben “Coach” Wade and Ozzy Lusth, both previous repeaters who are arguably polarizing (Coach was a freak the first time, and a puppy who got his fanboy head chopped off by Rob the second time; Ozzy’s just sort of a playa). And that sucks, because once again, these new Survivors don’t have the opportunity to just focus on the game and what these new strangers are up to. They have to deal with the cult of personality that the stars represent. And that’s an extra game. Ozzy is a great competitor physically, or at least he used to be, and Coach…well, you can’t predict anything about that kook, can you? All I know is that they’ve got an advantage, and if these new folks don’t get rid of them IMMEDIATELY, then they’re idiots. Ask Rob’s tribemates from last season if they’d have done that. (Another note: Don’t fake the funk just to vote someone out, like Russell’s tribe last year. You can’t win everything. The minute you lose, one of those jokers gotta go.)
2) Russell’s Nephew: Can’t you imagine poor host/Russell fan club prez Jeff Probst mulling this season in the confines of the air-conditioned palace where he must live when the Survivors are a bug buffet? Russell has vowed not to come back, and you can’t call him the greatest player ever since he’s never won once in three tries (Well, you could. But you’d look stupid). So, you invite his 19-year-old nephew Brandon. Unless you’re gonna fan wank all over him and bring his uncle up all the time, why bother? And for all of you readers who think I’m obsessed with Russell – If they stop bringing him up, I’ll stop writing about him. But don’t keep him in my face and not expect me to write about him. He’s a great player. But he’s helped the producers hurt my show.
3) “Redemption Island”: I kinda thought that last year, the whole point of “RI” was to make sure that Russell or Rob, should they have been voted off, had another shot back into the game. But they’re doing it again. I sort of liked it at first, because of the domination of Matt for so much of the season. But the big problem is that players like Matt, particularly if they hang out for so long on “RI,” don’t have the chance to get to know the rest of the tribe, to become “one of us” or to understand the politics. They have a target on their back immediately, and it’s predictable that if they win their way back, they’re gonna be the first ones out again. That’s not a lot of fun.
I have not yet decided whether or not I’ll be blogging “Survivor” every week if I decide to watch it - this is going to be a busy fall and I don’t know if I have the time. What do you think about the changes? And the things that never change?